Rationale

The rationale has been clearly articulated in the summary provided (c.c. overview)

Successes

This has had a highly positive effect upon student learning and has meant that all of the modules for which I am responsible are very highly evaluated by students. Students have been able to demonstrate a high degree of criticality in their work and a deeper engagement in learning than otherwise would have been the case.

Lessons Learnt

It is a very simple, cost-effective (in terms of time and energy) way of enhancing student learning and promoting student autonomy that is not reliant on a high degree of technology. It requires diligence, hard work and the provision of high quality feedback to students. Students also need to understand the rationale for the approach which is why I often share the ‘Teaching Understanding Framework’ with them and share the understanding goals at the beginning of each session. 

Challenges

The above approach is ideal for tutorial-sized groups but could present difficulties for larger groups as it requires an interactive approach between lecturer and students. Depending upon the format which students adopt for their Reflective Journals and Log Books (and it is important to give students a sense of ownership over this), it may not be possible for students to submit this aspect of their work through ‘My Place’. This I have not found problematic but it could present difficulties for larger student cohorts.

Scalability

Taking account of the above proviso, this approach should present few difficulties in this respect. There are no physical resources required (nor complex technology) other than would be required for normal teaching. However, staff training in this approach would be valuable as it would enhance the quality of delivery for students.

Suggestions for Transferability

Highly transferable to any context.

Attachments

Example of a Reflective Journal

learning journal MLE 3-1.pdf