Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Excerpt

This page provides an overview of the different feedback types available for assignments



Click Images to Enlarge

Feedback options can be accessed in the 'Feedback Types' section of assignment settings


Advanced methods are located in the 'Grade' section

Online/offline submissions

Online/Offline Marking

For feedback options for Offline Submissions, please see Grade Items

Multiple markers: The recommended multiple marker methods are online because this means safeguards can be in place to see if work has already been marked to save unnecessary work. However it is possible to mark offline with multiple markers, these safeguards wont be in place so be sure to allocate the work correctly.

Blind marking: All methods work with blind marking

Double-blind marking: Submissions can be downloaded and the offline grading worksheet used whilst the other marker uses online. But would they overwrite each other?

Where there is blind marking an approach is for one assessor to mark on Moodle and the other to mark downloaded submissions and use the offline grading worksheet to make notes or give feedback. - UCL

Recommendation: We recommend using Annotate PDF where possible


Feedback TypeDescriptionProsConsOffline MarkingMultiple MarkersMore Info 

Feedback Comment

Leave comments for each submission, from within the grading interface. Can also add files such as audio recordings or images

  • Free-form
  • Can be used with comments inline
  • Can appear generic
  • Labour-intensive
  • Not user-friendly
  • Doesn’t give confidence to students
  • that their work has been read




Comment InlineThis is related to feedback comments, as it is only available if feedback comments is available. 
  • Not as user-friendly as Annotate PDF
  • Only works on text submissions?



Annotate PDF

Allows for in-browser editing of submissions by annotating them with comments, drawings and stamps without the need for extra software. Students then download the annotated version of their work



  • Demonstrates that the student’s work has been thoroughly checked
  • Appears clean and structured
  • User-friendly tool when used online
  • Lighter to work with
  • Only certain file types (.pdf, .docx, .odf) 
  • More applicable to essay styles
  • Must be done online
  • Requires certain file types as submissions
  • Potential issues with speed and web service performance


Annotating an Assignment
Feedback Files

Uploading files such as annotated student work, comments and audio. 

  • Provides opportunity to write comments outside of MyPlace
  • Provides opportunity to upload files in bulk
  • Requires external work
  • Can be time-intensive


Upload Feedback Files in Bulk
Offline Grading WorksheetIn the comment column information can be added and will be displayed as it would for the 'feedback comment' option
  • Best method to use for offline submissions
  • Quick entry of grades
  • Not-personalised
  • Not recommended for simultaneous feedback marking
  • Suits short feedback
  • Feedback is not formatted


Uploading marks to Myplace with the grading worksheet
Rubric

While marking guides allow you to specify criteria, but you can only give a numeric grade, rubrics by default point to the category. Normally in a qualitative rubric only feedback is given, with no numeric grade, however you can define points for each level, which will automatically calculate a grade, making the rubric quantitative too. You can also leave a comment for each of the criteria.Allows a rubric to be created and used for marking where markers select the level of grade to be given for each criterion. Comments can also be added



  • Quick to mark withFeedback can seem standardised
  • Standardised approached for classes with lots of markers
  • Feedback doesn't seem personalised to students, unless adequate comments are added
  • Difficult to weight / apply to the University percentage scales


Marking Rubric

Image Added


Marking Guide

The student's work is assessed on pre-defined criteria, with the marker entering a comment and a score per criterion. The final score gives the overall grade for the student. Guides are considered a quantitative grading method, as the marker can only provide a numeric assessment of the quality of submitted work. The text given in the process of marking with a marking guide is for feedback purposes only. 

  • Easy for students to see how their mark relates to marking criteria
  • Structured entry of feedback for each marking criteria section




These all work with blind marking. For double blind marking, submissions can be downloaded and marked separately. Ensure properly 




Assignment Statistics

Although this is listed in the feedback types section in assignment setting, this is not an actual way to mark - rather it just provides extra information to students. If enabled, the student will be shown a histogram of marks across the class, and statistics such as mean and standard deviation. 

The statistics will be visible to the student when they can see the grade column for the assignment regardless of whether they have a grade so, if using this without blind marking enabled, you may wish to consider hiding the grade column until after the assignment has been marked

Note that, for data protection reasons, this will not be shown where there are fewer than 10 assignment submissions.

Online Submissions only

Image Removed



Image Added

Grade Items

To enter marks through Moodle:

Select 'Grades' from the Administration tab


Image Added

Select single view from the drop down

Image Added

Select the grade item desired from the drop down menu on right

Image Added

You will now be presented with the interface to enter grades and feedback. 

Image Added


Related Articles

Filter by label (Content by label)
sortmodified
reversetrue
typepage
cqllabel = "feedback" and type = "page"
labelsmyplace2016

...